Reaching the owner behind the entity, and the entity behind the owner.
Esshaki Legal Media TeamCurrent as of October 2021
Courts disregard the separateness of an entity where it is used as an alter ego
of its owner and observing the form would sanction injustice.
Traditional piercing reaches the owner’s assets for the entity’s debts.
Factors include undercapitalization at formation, commingling of funds, failure
to observe formalities, absence of records, common officers and offices,
diversion of assets, and use of the entity to promote fraud.
Two elements in most states. Unity of interest and ownership such that
separate personalities no longer exist, and an inequitable result if the acts
are treated as those of the entity alone. Neither alone suffices — an
under-formalized company that has done nothing wrong is generally not pierced.
Reverse piercing reaches entity assets for the owner’s debts. Outsider
reverse piercing is permitted in some states with caution, because it prejudices
innocent co-owners and the entity’s creditors. Insider reverse piercing, sought
by the owner to obtain a benefit belonging to the entity, is generally refused.
LLCs. Statutes in several states expressly provide that failure to observe
formalities is not a ground for imposing liability, which narrows the analysis
to commingling and fraud.
Enterprise liability treats affiliated entities under common control as one
where they are operated as a single business, and is a distinct theory from
piercing to owners.