Cooperation credit and the decision to self-report
A calculation the board makes once, usually under time pressure, with incomplete facts.
Esshaki Legal Media TeamCurrent as of February 2023
Enforcement policy across agencies offers reduced penalties for voluntary
self-disclosure, cooperation and remediation. The credit is real and the
conditions are demanding.
Voluntary self-disclosure generally requires disclosure before the
government learns of the conduct through another route, promptly after
discovery, and with all relevant facts then known. Disclosure after a
whistleblower complaint has already reached the agency usually does not qualify.
Cooperation typically requires identifying the individuals involved and
providing the facts about their conduct. Policies have shifted repeatedly on how
complete that identification must be, but the direction has consistently been
towards individual accountability as a condition of corporate credit.
Remediation means discipline where warranted, root cause analysis, and
compliance program changes that are implemented and tested rather than
announced.
What is not required. Waiver of attorney-client privilege as to legal
advice. Agencies state that disclosing relevant facts, including facts learned
in an internal investigation, is required, while privileged legal analysis is
not. The line is easier to state than to hold, and every disclosure decision
should be made with waiver consequences in civil litigation in view.
The counterweight. Self-reporting invites scrutiny of adjacent conduct,
triggers civil exposure, and may carry collateral consequences in licensing and
contracting.