Indemnity clauses and how they differ from a damages claim
A contractual promise to pay for loss, with its own triggers and procedures.
Esshaki Legal Media TeamCurrent as of May 2024
An indemnity is a promise to answer for loss, and it is not merely a restatement
of the right to damages for breach.
Differences that matter. An indemnity may cover loss without proof of
breach; may cover first-party as well as third-party claims; may not be subject
to the same causation and foreseeability limits; may run from a different
limitation start date; and may survive termination when other obligations do
not.
Third-party claim procedures. Notice within a stated period; the
indemnitor’s right to assume the defense with counsel reasonably acceptable;
conditions on settlement including whether the indemnitee’s consent is needed
for a settlement imposing non-monetary obligations; and cooperation. Failure to
give notice usually excuses the indemnitor only to the extent of prejudice, and
the clause should say so.
Limits. Caps, baskets and deductibles, de minimis thresholds, survival
periods, and exclusions for consequential damages. Whether the consequential
damages waiver elsewhere in the agreement applies to indemnity obligations is a
recurring ambiguity worth resolving expressly.
Negligence of the indemnitee. Indemnity for a party’s own negligence must
usually be stated clearly and conspicuously, and some states prohibit it in
construction contracts by statute.
Insurance interaction. An indemnity backed by required insurance, with
additional insured status and a waiver of subrogation, is far stronger than one
standing alone.