Sharing a credit, and the difference between owning a piece and merely being paid.
Esshaki Legal Media TeamCurrent as of November 2024
Institutions share large credits either by participation, where the lead retains
the loan and sells an interest, or by syndication, where multiple lenders are
each direct creditors of the borrower.
Participation. The borrower’s relationship is with the lead alone. The
participant holds a contractual right against the lead, which raises the
question at the heart of every participation dispute: if the lead becomes
insolvent, is the participant an owner of an interest or an unsecured creditor?
A true sale, properly documented and accounted for, is what determines the
answer.
Key participation terms. Whether the sale is with or without recourse; the
lead’s servicing standard, usually ordinary care or the standard applied to its
own loans; voting rights on amendments, waivers and enforcement; information
undertakings; and rights on default including the ability to compel action.
Syndication. Each lender has privity with the borrower; an agent administers
the facility under an agency provision that typically limits the agent’s duties
sharply and disclaims fiduciary status.
Due diligence does not transfer. A participant that relies on the lead’s
credit analysis without its own file is exposed both commercially and to
examiner criticism.
Concentration limits are measured on the retained portion; sold portions
must be genuinely sold to count.