Enforced far more readily than employment covenants, and for good reason.
Esshaki Legal Media TeamCurrent as of January 2026
A seller’s covenant not to compete, given in connection with the sale of a
business, is analyzed differently from an employee’s.
Why the difference. The buyer has paid for goodwill, and the covenant
protects what was bought. Courts recognize the bargaining is between
sophisticated parties for consideration, and enforce longer durations and
broader geographies than they would in employment.
Typical terms. Three to five years, sometimes longer, covering the
geography in which the business operated and the products or services it
provided, with non-solicitation of customers and employees.
Statutory treatment. Several states that sharply restrict employment
non-competes expressly except sale-of-business covenants, subject to conditions
about the seller’s ownership percentage and the covenant’s connection to the
sale.
Allocation of consideration. Assigning a portion of the purchase price to
the covenant supports enforceability and has tax consequences for both parties
that should be modelled.
Who gives it. The selling entity, its owners, and key employees individually.
A covenant from the entity alone is of limited value where the owners are the
business.
Drafting. Define the restricted business by reference to what the company
actually did, define territory concretely, and include a tolling provision
extending the period by any time spent in breach.