Where a development site straddles boundaries, or where one unit has the land and another the services, revenue sharing agreements allocate the benefits.
Authority. Statutes authorising conditional land transfers, joint economic development, and intergovernmental cooperation. Without express authority such arrangements are vulnerable, since a municipality generally may not give away tax revenue.
Structure. A defined district; allocation of property and income tax revenue by percentage; allocation of the cost of services; a term; and a governance mechanism for decisions within the district.
Zoning and approvals. Which unit’s ordinance applies, and whether a joint review process is created.
Infrastructure. Who builds, who maintains, and how capacity is allocated.
Term and termination. Long enough for the development to mature, with provisions for what happens on termination — which is where these agreements are usually silent.
Amendment requiring action by each participating body.
Practical value. These agreements resolve the incentive problem that produces boundary disputes and competitive incentive bidding between neighbouring units, and they are politically difficult precisely because they require both bodies to accept a fixed division in advance.