Losing or destroying evidence you had a duty to keep. The sanction often hurts more than the evidence would have.
Esshaki Legal Media TeamCurrent as of May 2026
Spoliation is the destruction, alteration or loss of evidence that a party had a
duty to preserve. The duty attaches when litigation is reasonably anticipated,
which is usually earlier than a party assumes.
Sanctions scale with culpability and prejudice. Negligent loss may draw
additional discovery, cost-shifting, or measures to cure the prejudice. Loss with
intent to deprive the other side of the evidence opens the severest remedies: an
instruction that the jury may presume the lost material was unfavourable,
exclusion of related evidence, or dismissal or default.
Two features make spoliation disproportionately damaging. It is a claim about
the party’s conduct rather than the dispute, and it is raised at every subsequent
stage. And it usually happens by accident — automated deletion policies running
as designed on custodians nobody thought to include in a hold.
The defense is procedural and boring: a documented preservation notice,
suspension of automated deletion, and a record of what was preserved and when.