Exhaustion, the record and a deferential standard.
Esshaki Legal Media TeamCurrent as of November 2021
Review of agency action follows a path distinct from ordinary civil appeals.
Exhaustion. Administrative remedies must generally be pursued to completion
before a court will hear the challenge, with narrow exceptions for futility,
inadequacy and constitutional claims outside the agency’s competence.
Finality. The action must mark the consummation of the decision-making
process and determine rights or obligations. Interim and advisory actions are
not reviewable.
Standing requires injury within the zone of interests the statute protects.
The record. Review is confined to the administrative record, which the
agency compiles. Supplementing it requires a showing that the agency omitted
material it considered, or that the record is inadequate to permit review.
Extra-record evidence is admitted rarely.
Standards. Factual findings for substantial evidence; agency action
generally for whether it was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or
otherwise not in accordance with law; and questions of law with independent
judgment, with the deference framework substantially narrowed.
Remedy. Vacatur and remand, or remand without vacatur where the defect may
be curable and vacatur would be disruptive.
Deadlines. Petition periods are short and jurisdictional, and they run from
publication or service depending on the statute.